Cross-posted at the IU Press Journals blog:
Ivan Kreilkamp, an associate professor of English at Indiana University at Bloomington and co-editor of Victorian Studies, appreciates the scholarly possibilities of Web 2.0. But he argues that the traditional humanities journal produces "dense, deeply researched, and extensively edited works of scholarship that have a depth and thoroughness that can't generally be found in the realm of blogs and listservs."
"You could think of our kind of scholarship," he said, "as something like 'slow food' in a fast-food culture."
Read more in the March 27 edition of the Chronicle of Higher Education online on the topic, Humanities Journals Confront Identity Crisis.
Recent Comments